Untitled Document
 
연구사업 |학술회의 |소식/안내 |자료실 |동영상/갤러리 |
 
 
 
 
>> 추천도서
>> 보고서
>> 논문
>> 발표/강의
>> 뉴스기사
>> 운영위원칼럼
>> 공지사항
 
[한국산업식품공학회] 추계 ...
 
제   목  
미국 FDA, 한국산 굴 등 조개류 판매금지 조치 - IFT Newsletter
[ 2012-06-21 09:29:06 ]
글쓴이  
관리자
조회수: 22229        
다운로드 #1  
IFT_Newsletter_June_2012_한글_문서.hwp ( 48 KB ), Down: 7168

1. 미국 FDA, 한국산 굴 등 조개류 판매금지 조치 (2012년 5월 1일)

2. 미국 캘리포니아주, GM식품 표시제도 강화에 대한 주민투표(11월 실시예정)

 

FDA urges removal of some Korean seafood products from the marketThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is urging food distributors, retailers, and foodservice operators to remove from sale or service all fresh, frozen, canned, and processed oysters, clams, mussels, and whole and roe-on scallops (molluscan shellfish) from Korea that have entered the United States. This includes molluscan shellfish from Korea that entered the United States prior to May 1, 2012, when the FDA removed such products from the Interstate Certified Shellfish Shippers List (ICSSL), and that which may have inadvertently entered the country after that date. These products and any products made with them may have been exposed to human fecal waste and are potentially contaminated with norovirus.

Molluscan shellfish contaminated with fecal waste and/or norovirus are considered adulterated under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Following initial notifications in May, a number of food companies have begun to remove these products from their distribution chain. However, many others have yet to take action.

A comprehensive FDA evaluation determined that the Korean Shellfish Sanitation Program (KSSP) no longer meets the sanitation controls specified under the United States’ National Shellfish Sanitation Program. The FDA’s evaluation found significant deficiencies with the KSSP including inadequate sanitary controls, ineffective management of land-based pollution sources, and detection of norovirus in shellfish growing areas.

The deficiencies in the KSSP prompted the FDA to remove all Korean certified shippers of molluscan shellfish from the ICSSL on May 1, 2012. Although Korean molluscan shellfish represent only a small fraction of the oysters, clams, mussels, and scallops sold in the U.S., the removal of Korean shellfish shippers from the ICSSL is an important step in stopping the importation of molluscan shellfish harvested from polluted waters.

These actions only affect molluscan shellfish harvested from Korean waters. They do not affect the receipt of fresh and frozen molluscan shellfish by distributors, retailers, and foodservice operators from any of the other shellfish shippers listed in the ICSSL. Further, these actions do not affect the importation of canned and other processed product made with molluscan shellfish harvested from non-Korean waters. The FDA is in ongoing discussions with Korean authorities to resolve the issue.

Press release

California to vote on GMO labelingAccording to the Associated Press, California voters will decide this November whether to require special labels for food made from genetically modified ingredients. Advocates collected more than half a million signatures supporting the stronger labeling requirements, and the Secretary of State has certified the measure for the state’s November ballot.

If it passes, California would be the first state to require labeling of such a wide range of foods containing GMOs. The proposal would require most processed foods by 2014 to bear a label telling shoppers that they contain ingredients derived from plants whose DNA was altered with genes from other plants, animals, viruses, or bacteria.

Many backers of similar legislation in more than a dozen states say the intent is to give consumers more information about what they’re eating, and foster transparency and trust in the food system. Major agricultural groups and the processed food industry oppose stricter labeling, saying it risks sowing fear and confusion among shoppers.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) says genetically modified foods pose no greater health risks than traditional foods. Opponents of labeling rules say they could prompt hikes in packaging costs. If the measure passes, most raw or processed food made from plants or animals with engineered genetic material would need to be labeled, although certified organic foods and alcohol would be exempted. Meat and dairy products also would not require a label if the animals are fed with genetically engineered grains.

AP article




89/199, 총 게시물 : 3975
2215 1990년대 식량·생필품 원조 …2000년대엔 농업발전 지원 - 농민신문 관리자 2018-05-10 51 9249
2214 ‘식품 안전성문제’ 소비자 - 과학계 소통 필요 - 농민신문 관리자 2018-05-10 51 8879
2213 모든 생명은 유전자 변형의 산물 - 식품저널 관리자 2018-05-09 51 9473
2212 “식품은 4차 산업혁명의 최대 수혜 업종” - 식품음료신문 관리자 2018-05-09 51 10229
2211 4차 산업혁명 ‘식품 통한 행복감’ 극대화 - 식품음료신문 관리자 2018-05-09 51 10412
2210 발효식품을 미래산업으로 키워야 - 동아일보 관리자 2018-05-04 51 9469
2209 변형된 유전자를 먹으면 내 몸의 유전자도 변형된다고? - 식품저널 관리자 2018-05-04 51 9655
2208 식량종자로 글로벌 종자시장에 도전하자 - 농민신문 관리자 2018-05-03 51 11580
2207 미국·유럽, GEC(유전자교정작물)에 긍정적 반응 - 농민신문 관리자 2018-05-03 51 9725
2206 농업과 가치 - 농민신문 관리자 2018-05-03 51 12070
2205 괴담은 왜 GMO 제국 미국보다 개발도상국에 많을까 - 식품저널 관리자 2018-05-02 51 9564
2204 BT단백질이 위험하다고?…친환경 농업의 대표적인 소재 - 식품저널 관리자 2018-05-02 51 10184
2203 기업농이 육성되어야 한다 - 식품외식경제 관리자 2018-04-30 51 9936
2202 글리포세이트가 GMO보다 위험하다고? - 식품저널 관리자 2018-04-27 51 9335
2201 암에 대해 확정적으로 말하는 사람은 ‘아마추어’ - 식품저널 관리자 2018-04-27 51 9420
2200 GMO 완전표시제는 모두에게 실패 - 식품저널 관리자 2018-04-27 51 8991
2199 세계서 가장 많은 GMO 소비국가인데, GMO 표시 제품 없다고? - 식품저널 관리자 2018-04-27 51 9443
2198 GMO 걱정할 필요가 없는 이유 - 식품저널 관리자 2018-04-27 51 9526
2197 농식품부 인사 유감 - 농민신문 관리자 2018-04-25 51 9568
2196 GMO 표시하면 안전해지나 - 식품음료신문 관리자 2018-04-23 51 9977
첫 페이지   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90     끝 페이지
이름 제목 내용
 
 
   
  A few images from Freepik.com