Untitled Document
 
연구사업 |학술회의 |소식/안내 |자료실 |동영상/갤러리 |
 
 
 
 
>> 추천도서
>> 보고서
>> 논문
>> 발표/강의
>> 뉴스기사
>> 운영위원칼럼
>> 공지사항
 
[한국산업식품공학회] 추계 ...
 
제   목  
미국 FDA, 한국산 굴 등 조개류 판매금지 조치 - IFT Newsletter
[ 2012-06-21 09:29:06 ]
글쓴이  
관리자
조회수: 21894        
다운로드 #1  
IFT_Newsletter_June_2012_한글_문서.hwp ( 48 KB ), Down: 6846

1. 미국 FDA, 한국산 굴 등 조개류 판매금지 조치 (2012년 5월 1일)

2. 미국 캘리포니아주, GM식품 표시제도 강화에 대한 주민투표(11월 실시예정)

 

FDA urges removal of some Korean seafood products from the marketThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is urging food distributors, retailers, and foodservice operators to remove from sale or service all fresh, frozen, canned, and processed oysters, clams, mussels, and whole and roe-on scallops (molluscan shellfish) from Korea that have entered the United States. This includes molluscan shellfish from Korea that entered the United States prior to May 1, 2012, when the FDA removed such products from the Interstate Certified Shellfish Shippers List (ICSSL), and that which may have inadvertently entered the country after that date. These products and any products made with them may have been exposed to human fecal waste and are potentially contaminated with norovirus.

Molluscan shellfish contaminated with fecal waste and/or norovirus are considered adulterated under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Following initial notifications in May, a number of food companies have begun to remove these products from their distribution chain. However, many others have yet to take action.

A comprehensive FDA evaluation determined that the Korean Shellfish Sanitation Program (KSSP) no longer meets the sanitation controls specified under the United States’ National Shellfish Sanitation Program. The FDA’s evaluation found significant deficiencies with the KSSP including inadequate sanitary controls, ineffective management of land-based pollution sources, and detection of norovirus in shellfish growing areas.

The deficiencies in the KSSP prompted the FDA to remove all Korean certified shippers of molluscan shellfish from the ICSSL on May 1, 2012. Although Korean molluscan shellfish represent only a small fraction of the oysters, clams, mussels, and scallops sold in the U.S., the removal of Korean shellfish shippers from the ICSSL is an important step in stopping the importation of molluscan shellfish harvested from polluted waters.

These actions only affect molluscan shellfish harvested from Korean waters. They do not affect the receipt of fresh and frozen molluscan shellfish by distributors, retailers, and foodservice operators from any of the other shellfish shippers listed in the ICSSL. Further, these actions do not affect the importation of canned and other processed product made with molluscan shellfish harvested from non-Korean waters. The FDA is in ongoing discussions with Korean authorities to resolve the issue.

Press release

California to vote on GMO labelingAccording to the Associated Press, California voters will decide this November whether to require special labels for food made from genetically modified ingredients. Advocates collected more than half a million signatures supporting the stronger labeling requirements, and the Secretary of State has certified the measure for the state’s November ballot.

If it passes, California would be the first state to require labeling of such a wide range of foods containing GMOs. The proposal would require most processed foods by 2014 to bear a label telling shoppers that they contain ingredients derived from plants whose DNA was altered with genes from other plants, animals, viruses, or bacteria.

Many backers of similar legislation in more than a dozen states say the intent is to give consumers more information about what they’re eating, and foster transparency and trust in the food system. Major agricultural groups and the processed food industry oppose stricter labeling, saying it risks sowing fear and confusion among shoppers.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) says genetically modified foods pose no greater health risks than traditional foods. Opponents of labeling rules say they could prompt hikes in packaging costs. If the measure passes, most raw or processed food made from plants or animals with engineered genetic material would need to be labeled, although certified organic foods and alcohol would be exempted. Meat and dairy products also would not require a label if the animals are fed with genetically engineered grains.

AP article




114/198, 총 게시물 : 3956
1696 식품산업, 나트륨저감화 열풍과 나트륨비교표시제 시행에 대한 의견 - 식품음료신문 관리자 2016-07-25 51 9677
1695 순수 우리말을 왜곡하는 것은 배운 자의 오만이다 - 식품외식경제 관리자 2016-07-25 51 10454
1694 밀ㆍ콩 등 밭 식량자급률 2020년까지 15.2% 높인다 - 식품저널 관리자 2016-07-21 51 10420
1693 일부 국회의원들의 GMO 정치 이슈화를 우려한다-식품음료신문 관리자 2016-07-20 2831 10562
1692 미국 GMO 표시법안 상원 이어 하원서도 통과 - 식품음료신문 관리자 2016-07-20 51 11087
1691 美, GMO 표시제 법안 상원 통과 - 식품음료신문 관리자 2016-07-19 51 9617
1690 GMO에 대한 보도 자세 - CNB저널 관리자 2016-07-18 51 9336
1689 GMO의 과학적 진실 - 식품음료신문 관리자 2016-07-18 51 9397
1688 U.S. SENATE PASSES BIOTECH LABELING BILL 관리자 2016-07-18 51 17786
1687 “GMO 정치 이슈화 우려…국익에 반하는 행위 - 식품저널 관리자 2016-07-14 51 9166
1686 일부 국회의원들의 GMO 정치이슈화를 우려한다. 관리자 2016-07-14 51 9280
1685 GMO 라벨링 잘못된 인식 초래 - 식품음료신문 관리자 2016-07-14 51 9972
1684 “GMO 표시제 확대 입법화는 국익에 반하는 행위” - 식품음료신문 관리자 2016-07-11 51 10321
1683 “GM(유전자변형) 기술은 보다 정밀한 관행 육종” - 식품음료신문 관리자 2016-07-11 51 11165
1682 GMO 표시 확대를 할 수 없는 이유 - 식품외식경제 관리자 2016-07-08 51 9432
1681 110 Nobel Laureates Sign Letter Calling Greenpeace to Stop GMO Opposition 관리자 2016-07-08 51 11441
1680 노벨상 수상자 100여명 “GMO 반대 운동, 근거 없다” - 한국일보 관리자 2016-07-08 51 10863
1679 지속적인 농업발전 - 농수축산신문 관리자 2016-07-07 51 10103
1678 대기업 농업진출, 상생이 해답이다 - 농수축산신문 관리자 2016-07-07 51 10232
1677 나트륨 섭취와 심혈관질환-너무 많아도 걱정, 너무 적어도 걱정 - 식품음료신문 관리자 2016-07-07 51 9518
첫 페이지   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120     끝 페이지
이름 제목 내용
 
 
   
  A few images from Freepik.com